||Demonstrates a connection to the mission and core values of NODA
||Proposal has clearly defined learning outcomes
||Proposal addressed how the presentation will meet learning outcomes
||Inclusion of assessment or outcome data when relevant
||Intentionally addresses how information can be applied to other institution types
||Evidence of application of theoretical models, current research, and/or best practices in the field
||Proposal is written professionally: tone, grammar, spelling, etc.
||No stated or implied connection to mission/core values.
||No stated or implied learning outcomes.
||No stated learning outcomes or no attempt to connect learning outcomes to program proposal.
||No mention of data or assessment.
||No acknowledgement or potential for program to be applied to other institutions.
||No indication that program is grounded in theory, research, or best practices.
||Numerous grammatical/spelling mistakes. Writing is unprofessional in tone and style.
||Mission/core values stated in program description although connection is not clear.
||No stated learning outcomes although program description demonstrates some potential for participant learning.
||Program proposal makes weak connections toward achieving learning outcomes.
||Proposal makes some mention of assessment or outcome data.
||Proposal has potential for applicability to other institutions.
||Proposal states no specific theories, research, or best practice, but is an accepted application in the field.
||Some grammatical/ spelling mistakes. Writing is unprofessional in tone and style.
||No stated connection to mission/core values, although implications for this connection are readily apparent.
||Learning outcomes stated in program description.
||Program proposal indicates how learning outcomes will be achieved.
||Proposal indicates that assessment or outcome data will accompany program description.
||Proposal makes an attempt to indicate applicability to other institutions.
||Proposal states specific theories, research, or best practices.
||Few, if any, grammatical/spelling mistakes. Writing is fairly professional in tone and style.
||Clearly articulated connection between mission/core values and program topic.
||Clearly articulated learning outcomes.
||Clearly articulated connection between learning outcomes and program content.
||Proposal demonstrates a clear intent to include relevant assessment or outcome data in detail.
||Proposal clearly indicates how program may be applied to other institutions.
||Proposal clearly indicates a grounding in and intent to apply theory, research, or best practices.
||Proposal is well written and professional. No grammatical/spelling mistakes.
This rubric will use a 1 - 4 scale with no neutral category. Final scores will be calculated as MEAN ratings rather than totals, to control for proposals that do not include assessment/outcome data.
The Ed Sessions Co-Chairs will select a set of program sessions to serve as alternates that can fill in for sessions that are cancelled..